Ad previews delivered May 6 via the review portal; sent to Linus team via email "For Review: Health 2035 Report LinkedIn Ads Previews." Approval unblocks the $500/mo retargeting campaign launch (targeted week of May 12).
V5 redelivered May 7 with corrected HSBC link (now hsbcinnovationbanking.com/us/en) across all assets. Already approved May 5; this is the final link-confirm step before publication (scheduled May 12).
Five-email nurture sequence built and internally tested in Act-On May 6. Test emails to Kristin/Hamid pending. Final activation targeted May 14, gated on this approval and Email #3 content publishing.
Awaiting Approval
TLG-19 AEP — Email #3 Content Publishing Status
Tatjana noted on May 6 that Email #3 needs its referenced content piece published before the link can be added and the program activated. Information needed on publishing date so the AEP can move to live.
TLG-22: Ad Previews created, Final Review & Sent to Client
Completed May 6
TLG-15: Health 2035 Exec Brief — [Client] Design Approved
Completed May 6
TLG-19: Emails Built & Internal Tests Sent (5-email AEP sequence)
Completed May 6
TLG-19: Check Content for Publication
Completed May 6
New Leads
18
+3 vs 15 prior week
Conversions
9
+2 vs 7 prior week
MQLs
2
-1 vs 3 prior week
SQLs
0
vs 0 prior week
Scoring criteria:Hot — VP+/CXO/Director-level marketing, commercial, or strategy roles at life sciences tools, diagnostics, medtech, pharma, or biotech companies, with a conversion on a high-intent form and a business email domain.
Warm — Manager-to-Director marketing/commercial roles in target verticals, OR senior leaders with limited engagement, OR senior sales-side roles at relevant companies.
Cold — Converted leads in non-target verticals, unclear roles with low engagement, or business emails with no role/persona match.
Spam / Job Seeker — Personal email domains (gmail/hotmail/yahoo) with no name or enrichment.
Article: Are Life Science Tools Suppliers Losing Commercial Influence to AI?
Assessment
CEO of Specac — UK-based scientific instruments manufacturer (FTIR sampling accessories), squarely in life sciences tools.
Top-tier authority: full budget and strategic decision ownership.
Business email + converted on the AI Research article — the campaign's core lead-gen asset.
One page view limits the engagement signal; a quick personal outreach from Hamid or Ashley could quickly establish whether persuasion-model framing resonates.
Article: Are Life Science Tools Suppliers Losing Commercial Influence to AI?
Assessment
VP of Marketing — exact title match for Decision-Maker Persona 1.
Daily Thermetrics is industrial process instrumentation, adjacent to but not core life sciences tools — partial vertical fit. Marketing leadership matters more than the vertical edge here.
Business email + LinkedIn-attributed conversion on the campaign's flagship asset.
Worth a tailored outreach that frames LINUS's persuasion model in industrial-instrument context to test cross-vertical resonance.
Second Cepheid contact this week — pattern worth noting in case multiple visitors signal an internal evaluation.
Regional Sales Director — same caveats as the other Cepheid contact (sales side, not marketing decision-maker).
Act-On attribution suggests a nurture send, not the paid campaign.
Per the April 29 multi-visitor company analysis initiative, Cepheid may warrant a deliberate enrichment pass to identify the marketing/strategy stakeholder.
Article: Are Life Science Tools Suppliers Losing Commercial Influence to AI?
Assessment
Sellular Biology is a small biotech consultancy/operator — Principal is a high-authority title, but the company size is below the Series A+ minimum LINUS set in February.
Could still be a valuable advocate if Corey works with target companies as a consultant.
LinkedIn paid attribution; clean conversion on the campaign's lead asset.
Personal gmail address with no enrichment. The conversion + Google attribution + four page views is unusual — the conversion form (Insiders Signup or similar) may indicate a real but anonymous individual subscriber rather than spam.
If MQL/SQL criteria require a business email or named lead, this won't qualify.
Conversions by Source
Article: Are Life Science Tools Suppliers Losing Commercial Influence to AI?
4
44%
Insiders Signup
3
33%
Ready to make a difference?
1
11%
Get persuasive insights
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Paid Media — LinkedIn Ads
Spend
$325.32
-7.1% vs $350.00 prior week
Clicks
59
-15.7% vs 70 prior week
CTR
0.67%
+0.09pp vs 0.58% prior week
CPC
$5.51
+10.2% vs $5.00 prior week
Conversions
13
-51.9% vs 27 prior week
CPA
$25.02
+93% vs $12.96 prior week
Monthly Budget Pacing
Active campaigns now total $2,000/month in committed daily budget — AI Research lead gen at $40/day (~$1,200/mo) plus the State of Young Physicians awareness campaign launched May 7 at $800/mo. The Health 2035 Report retargeting campaign (TLG-22, $500/mo) is queued pending client ad approval; once live, total spend will rise to ~$2,500/mo. Weekly spend during the report period was $325 — pacing in line with the $1,200/mo AI Research allocation since that was the only fully active campaign.
Campaign
Spend
Clicks
Conv
CPA
Daily Budget
Status
NF — Lead Gen — Are Life Science Tools Suppliers Losing Commercial Influence to AI?
$280.00
24
7
$40.00
$40
Active
NF — Website Visits — The Four Types of Skepticism
$45.32
35
0
—
—
Paused
NF — Conversion — Fixing the Messy Middle LP
$0.00
0
6
—
—
Completed
AI Research lead gen continues to do the work — 7 conversions at $40 CPA, on-target for an upper-funnel campaign feeding the Executive Briefing offer. Conversions dropped vs prior week (13 vs 27), but the prior week's number was lifted by 6 conversions still being attributed to the now-completed Messy Middle LP campaign with no new spend behind them. Four Types of Skepticism is paused per the April 30 strategic decision to reallocate budget toward Young Physicians at launch. State of Young Physicians ($800/mo) launched May 7 — too late to appear in this period's data.
Email
Sent
3,114
vs 352 prior week
Open Rate
29.8%
-7.1pp vs 36.9% prior week
Click Rate
1.3%
-3.0pp vs 4.3% prior week
Campaigns
1
this period
Campaign
Sent On
Sent
Open Rate
Click Rate
Hamid at MATTER (May Newsletter)
Mon May 5
3,114
29.8%
1.3%
The May newsletter (renamed from April after the date slip) hit the master Life Sciences list — 3,114 recipients, 29.8% open rate sits inside the 25–35% benchmark from the December 2025 baseline. Click rate of 1.3% is below the 2–5% benchmark, likely because the dominant CTA was the MATTER Chicago event (a Boston event for an audience that's nationally distributed) rather than a click-through to gated content. Direct comparison to the prior week's "Not Buying It — Buy on Amazon" send (352 recipients, 4.3% CTR) is apples-to-oranges — different list, different audience size, different CTA. Heads up: the connector flagged 553 unsubscribes (~17.8%) on this send. That's well outside normal range (typical: 0.1–0.5%) and almost certainly a data-pull artifact rather than a real list-hygiene event — worth a quick verification in Act-On directly.
Campaign Calendar — May 2026 – Jul 2026
Externally-visible milestones, sends, campaign launches, and client action items across the current month and the next two. Future-month items reflect current planning and may shift.